I’ve been rereading a book by Peter Kreeft today called “The Philosophy of Jesus” in preparation for a Philosophy class at the diocese this weekend. It uses what my dad would call five dollar words. Metaphysics. Epistemology. Philosophical Anthropology, and probably the most common familiar term to most today, Ethics. All of those terms can be boiled down to simple questions.
- Metaphysics – What is reality?
- Epistemology – Knowing what reality is, how do we know that it is real?
- Philosophical Anthropology – Based on those findings, who am I? What does it mean to be me/human/etc?
- And Ethics – With all of the above, how should we live based on reality and our selves?
CCC 679 Christ is Lord of eternal life. Full right to pass definitive judgment on the works and hearts of men belongs to him as redeemer of the world. He “acquired” this right by his cross. The Father has given “all judgment to the Son”. Yet the Son did not come to judge, but to save and to give the life he has in himself. By rejecting grace in this life, one already judges oneself, receives according to one’s works, and can even condemn oneself for all eternity by rejecting the Spirit of love. |
CCC 1849 Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbor caused by a perverse attachment to certain goods. It wounds the nature of man and injures human solidarity. It has been defined as “an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law.” |
Christianity adds two men to it’s database that secular anthropology does not know: Adam and Christ, the only two innocent men who have ever lived, and Christianity judges fallen men by that norm. Without that corrective, we inevitably think backwards and misunderstand our present sinfulness as natural and normal, and thus see innocence and even sainthood, as abnormal and unnatural, superhuman rather than human. Peter Kreeft – The Philosophy of Jesus